( Dear readers kindly note – that after years of research and personal investigations into Judeo-Christianity in Northern Africa, Middle East & Europe, today I am finally publishing an article and a great eye opener on Christianity. This is my first step to de-conversion from the most atrocious religion of all time called Christianity.I will no longer write pro-Christian articles on this website anymore, but at the same time I am not deleting any of my earlier articles on Christianity. Readers are advised to kindly read this and the forthcoming articles with an open mind, you are free to comment or to ask me questions, or debate with me on this topic and all your comments will be posted. At no time do I intend to take away my readers from their faith or to leave Christianity and after this exposition of Christianity I have become more closer to the nature God, whose creation and existence can be felt by everyone . Its difficult to perceive God as male or trinity or closed in a temple or church. The very books of scriptures coming out of middle east always keeps the followers bounded in blind faith in the wrathful God and a damnation to Hell. I accept that Gods greatest gift to us is our knowledge and our free wil, which we should exercise with great responsibility and not through religious dogmas. I had enough of this Church lies and fables that has stopped the growth of human beings for last 2000 years and due to which we have been destroying nature, hating everyone around and killing in the name of religion Alarmingly my in-depth studies in Egyptology and Astronomy lead to to discover that the Bible stories are nothing but fables from ancient Egypt, Greek,Rome, Babylon reproduced as a historic fact. Although this Biblical historic fact doe not sreve any reasoning outside the scriptures and one can only render it back to the ancient Egyptian mythologies. We have so strongly led to believe that out of some many religions in world only ours is true. Its time to really get closer to natural God and stop this insane religious madness
. I received a good response for my earlier article on THE BOOK OF REVELATION FRAUD, therefore I am going to post more evidences and arguments on the MYTH OF CHRISTIANITY and the existence of JESUS CHRIST. This post is just the start of my age of realisation and away from blind faith, ignorance of Christian belief and all the unnecessary Christian preachings.)
x-x-x-x–x-x-x-x-x–x-x-x-x-x-x–x-x-x-x-x-x-x–x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
The most important character of the Bible, Jesus Christ has been regarded with high esteem. He has been a moral teacher, prophet, God, holy spirit, alpha, omega, son of God, healer, exorcist, etc for last 2000 years. Even many non-Christians think that he gave an admirable example of moral living. Although his historic existence is unavailable outside the canonical gospels and there is not even single notable historian of his time that ever mentioned about Jesus Christ in their writings. I wonder why such a charismatic leader or son of God didn’t find himself in substantial history books. Even the authors of the four gospels, namely Mark, Mathew, Luke & John cannot give an account of Jesus Christ as their eye witnesses. Regardless of Jesus Christ existed or not, I felt it compelling to examine his wisdom and morality of his nature from the Bible. I have been in the Bible studies last three decades and over a decade preached the word of God , as its described to be the word of the Biblical God. I was always caught up off-guard when the young ones or teenagers asked me certain questions referring to the Bible and how I was unable to reply them, eventually dodged them with my own interpretations. I am sure many other preachers, pastors, priests do the same when they are asked conflicting sentences from the Bible. However, when I raised these questions to several other experienced pasters, Catholic priests, Bishops, preachers they have all given me answers which were their own interpretations and contradictory from each other. Today I am free from this idiotic Christian dogma and this freedom has opened my eyes from this blind faith of ignorant people. Biblical scholarship in last hundred years has not yet reached the common people and thus millions of people around the world do not realise the inconsistencies & contradictions of the Bible. Basically the billion Christians around the world , I wonder if even a million have ever fully read and understood the Bible. Most Christians are living a Christian life just because of damnation that they will go to hell if not believed in Jesus or plainly because they were born to Christian parents. Politicians, businessmen and tyrants throughout history have misused Bible for their own interests and the Christians have on their hand more bloodshed than any other religion throughout history. Offcourse I will cover that in-depth in my next articles , but today lets examine if we should really admire Jesus Christ, Son of God or God.
The Gospels of the New Testament portray Jesus as vengeful, demeaning, intolerant, and hypocritical. In one section Jesus calls for love of enemies, yet in another to slay them. He tells others to not use hurtful names, yet he called others fools, dogs, and vipers. He calls for honoring parents in one verse, yet demands hate toward family members in another. Some of Jesus’ words against his adversaries depict what some would call anti-Semitism. Indeed, the verses of the New Testament have fueled the flames of anti-Jewishness for centuries.
The following gives a brief look at the Biblical evidence about the claims of Jesus with quotes from the King James bible (the most used bible in the world). If the reader utilizes self-honesty, the realization will come that the deeds and questionable wisdom of this Biblical character does not merit the admiration that so many have bestowed upon him.
For I am come to SET A MAN AT VARIANCE AGAINST HIS FATHER, AND THE DAUGHTER AGAINST HER MOTHER, AND THE DAUGHTER IN LAW AGAINST HER MOTHER IN LAW. And a MAN’S FOES SHALL BE THEY OF HIS OWN HOUSEHOLD.
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
Note: A few desperate apologists attempt to dismiss the verse above claiming that the word ‘hate’ here really doesn’t mean what it says. The problem with this approach boarders on complete deception and the ironic dismissal of the Bible and Biblical scholarship. The word ‘hate’ here comes from the ancient Greek word ‘miseo’ which means hate (from the primary ‘misos’ [hatred]). If any synonym could substitute for this word, it would come from a word like ‘detest,’ ‘loath,’ or ‘despise.’ Moreover, virtually all Bibles translate the term as hate. To deny this intent means to deny the Bible and the alleged word.
Christians in last century have been speaking so much of family values, but there is so much to say from Jesus Christ that he is going to bring each other against within their families. What kind of moral teacher would say something like this in a sane world. Jesus referred his mother by ‘woman’, not as mom, mother or anything that a mother was called by her son in that period in Israel. He never got married, we don’t hear that he ever had friends , only after the age of 30 he had disciples, he never feel in love with a woman, neither we read about his relationship with his siblings. What instructions of family values can a person of such character give to others, on the other hand we have clear-cut supposedly words of Jesus in Bible which doesn’t display anything positive on family values. Although there is nothing mentioned about his personal life in the Bible, but yes, the gospel writers do know what communication Jesus was having with God in private. I wonder how would someone know that. For the matter of fact the gospel writer even go to mention Jesus’ thoughts. How can someone , if Jesus existed write exactly what Jesus was thinking in his mind. All these sentences in the new testament only lead us to a concept known as ‘Mythological writings”.
I can hardly take any example on family values from this so-called Prince of Peace. He speaks only about divisions within the family and to leave the family to join him in his heaven in second life.
What would you think of a Christian boss who rebuked a worker for wishing to bury his recently deceased father and instead, insisted that the worker follow him? According to the Bible, Jesus responded to a request from a disciple who wished to attend to his father’s funeral:
But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury the dead.-Matthew 8:22
When a man decided to follow Jesus, he wanted to say goodbye to his family (Luke 9:61), but instead of leniency, Jesus replied to him:
…No man, having put his hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.-Luke 9:62
Jesus appears rude to his mother when he says:
Woman, what have I do to with thee?-John 2:4
You won’t see anti-abortionists citing this verse. It applies to Judas; note how the last part plays right into abortion:
The Son of man goeth as it is written of him: but woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born.-Matthew 26:24 [bold characters, mine]
The so-called morality of Jesus teaches hate, and abstinence against members of the family and advises against marriage. Indeed, if everyone on earth followed the virgin Jesus’ life to a tree, not only would we have no families, but the entire human species would become extinct within a generation. Anyone who wishes to hold the concept of a family as a moral imperative must abandon Jesus’ example.
Many Christians and non-believers alike extol the virtues of living peacefully, yet the Biblical Jesus makes it abundantly clear that he did not hold to this concept:
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace but a sword.-Matthew 10:34
So much for the peace on earth stuff we keep hearing about from uninformed Christians.
Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.-Luke 22:36
Although an all-powerful God could stop violence of man against man, Jesus accepted the concept of war with these admissions:
And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom.-Matthew. 24:6-7 [also see Mark 13:7-8]
During his “trial,” Jesus explained to Pilate that if his kingdom came from this world, his servants (followers) would fight to prevent him from being delivered to the Jews:
If my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews.-John 18:36
Jesus offers no advice for disarmament or how to achieve peaceful coexistence. Instead, throughout history one can find a plethora of examples of the Church using Biblical verses to justify wars, inquisitions, and violence against man. Anyone who comes with the intent of a “sword” instead of peace can hardly give an example of living peacefully on Earth. Jesus tells us not to feel troubled and that war must occur. Belief in these words virtually allow wars to occur. Although many extremists, racist groups, and terrorists may admire Jesus for his call for armament, the majority of people do not realize the influence that Jesus’ words have on believers who accept violence after having studied the Bible. Jesus does not deserve the title of Prince of Peace* or our admiration for his war-like views.
* Note: The title, “Prince of Peace” does not appear anywhere in the New Testament and only appears once in the Old Testament (Isaiah 9:6). In spite of Christians who like to believe the Isaiah verse refers to a prophetic statement about Jesus, the Hebrew scholars tell us the Hebrew verbs in Isaiah 9:6 appear in the past tense. The title refers to the prophecy, not necessarily the man as it could refer to any number of kings, past or future (many other ancients also commonly referred to favored kings as the ‘Prince of Peace’). It also bears importance that the title directly contradicts the Gospels own account of the alleged Jesus who claimed he did not come for peace (see the verses above), which would have made the alleged prophecy an outright falsehood. Moreover, nowhere in the New Testament does Jesus ever get referred to as Counsellor, or everlasting Father (Jesus represents the Son, not the Father), nor did he set up a government of peace (Isaiah 9:7). On the contrary, only intolerance and wars resulted from belief in Jesus. If you wish to see Jesus as a prince, perhaps Prince of Darkness describes him better.
Many Christians believe that Jesus represents God, or God sent to earth in human form, or as a component of the Trinity. If people believe this, how many of them realize that the Old Testament gives many examples of God ordering or personally murdering innocent men, women, and children, along with the destruction of cities, buildings, and other religions? The following gives just a few examples:
…the LORD smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt…-Exodus 12:29
Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every green tree:
And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place.-God in Deuteronomy 12:2-3Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
-God in I Samuel 15:3
Therefore, if you believe that Jesus equals God in the flesh, then Christ must hold responsibility for the death, destruction, and intolerance practiced throughout the Old Testament.
However, some Christians do not believe in the Trinity or that Jesus equals God but rather that he lived as a flesh and blood man created and sent from God. Unfortunately, this does not dismiss Jesus from his admission towards killing. According to the New Testament, Jesus upholds all the laws of the Old Testament:
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.-Matthew: 5:17-18
To fulfill all the laws of the prophets means that Jesus must have approved of all the “lawful” atrocities, including Deuteronomy 12:2-3 or the killing of all unbelievers (Deuteronomy 13-5-9), and all the other intolerant laws of the prophets.
Killing appears quite acceptable to Jesus, not only for himself, but as ordered by him (as the nobleman) in this parable:
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.-Luke 19:27
The red letter edition of the King James Bible has Jesus making a remarkable statement towards the killing of children:
And I will kill her children with death…-Revelation 2:23
Not only does the Biblical Jesus make the claim to kill children but supposedly it serves to punish the mother (the prophetess as the metaphorical Jezebel) for committing adultery. Few people hold to the concept of punishing innocent children for the wrongful acts of their parents. This sickening performance by Jesus hardly gives us a reason for admiration. On the contrary, it appears loathsome and thoughtless.
Note: Some interpret Rev. 2:23 as a metaphor for the “children” (people) who followed the “heathen” religion (especially in Asia Minor). However, this would imply an even worse and deplorable atrocity. This would involve Jesus in the murder of hundreds, if not millions, of deaths of people who followed non-Christian beliefs, and of course would include children as well as adults.
Jesus, Satan, or both?
The following will no doubt upset many naive Christians, but if anyone wishes to indulge in Christian lore, the image of Jesus and God has an amazing twist that few Christians realize or want to think about. It begins from two incredible verses from the Old Testament :
AND Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.-I Chronicles 21:1AND again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.
Either the above examples give evidence for a grand error (or fiction) in the Bible or else we have Satan and the Lord as the same entity! Also from the Old Testament we have the revelation of the creator of evil:
I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.-God in Isaiah 45:7
How many Christians realize God as the creator of evil? And if you believe that Jesus equals God in the flesh, then Jesus must also hold responsibility for the creation of evil. (See also evil and good from God: Lamentations 3:38-39)
Now here comes an even more shocking Bible realization: the name “Lucifer” (another name for Satan) means light bearer, or morning star.
On the very last page of the Bible Jesus reveals himself and provides the amazing kicker ending of the entire “Holy” Bible:
I am the root and offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.-Revelation 22:16
And the very last words of Jesus in the Bible, makes it the greatest and longest lived lie of all time (something only a devil would say):
| Surely, I come quickly.-Revelation 22:20 |
Perhaps the reader will now understand why some Satanist cults use the same Bible as the Christians.
Note: The idea of the name Lucifer as synonymous with Satan goes back for centuries. In Isaiah 14:12, St. Jerome, translated the Hebrew word for “morning star” into the Latin term “Lucifer” (light bearer), a name commonly ascribed to Satan by Christians, and represents the fallen star, an ancient symbol for the fallen or evil one. In the NRSV Bible version, Isaiah 14:12 describes the fallen as “O Day Star, son of Dawn!” The Day Star, or morning star actually refers to the planet Venus, although, of course, the ancients did not know about planets. Venus always appears low on the horizon and the ancients thought of it as a star fallen from heaven (fallen angel). Venus also appears as the brightest “star” in the sky, thus the reference to the “bright and morning star” in Rev. 22:16. Although the Isaiah verse describes the fallen king of Babylon, Christians have, for centuries, ascribed Satan as taking many forms (for example the serpent). Thus, a conclusion, based on Christian beliefs of Satan, and the belief in the “inerrancy” of the Bible, one must conclude that Jesus has revealed himself as Satan!
Although a believer might find comfort in some of Jesus’ words, it should serve as a reminder that just because a man appears righteous does not necessarily mean he always practices it. Imagine observing a man who tells the truth most of the time but occasionally tells a hurtful lie. Should we not feel wary of such a person? Or if someone breaks his promise, should we not feel cheated? Especially if that person calls himself the Son of Man, we should expect him to act perfectly all the time, not just some of the time. His saying should reflect consistency, giving no hint of hypocrisy. However, the main character of the gospels, Jesus “Christ,” gave no hint of consistency. The performances of Jesus describe the actions of a con-artist, gives obvious half-truths and then promises them salvation for their sacrifice. Moreover, the Biblical Jesus gives wrongful information, breaks promises, lies, calls people unsavory names, orders killings, and threatens to kill children. He gave questionable advice about income, marriage, and future plans and he ended his short life in tragic suicidal death. As David Hume wrote, “A man delirious, or noted for falsehood and villainy, has no manner of authority with us.”
Many Christians object to any criticism of their religion where they see only the bad without the good. But imagine that I saw a friend about to drink a poisoned glass of milk, even if the poison represented only a small percentage of the whole. Should I include the nutritious aspects of the milk in my warning? Of course not. And although I might replace my friend’s poisoned milk with a glass of pure milk, this cannot be done with the Bible without acting dishonestly or ignorantly to the alleged infallibility of its words. And mind you, the problems do not come from a small percentage of the whole, but the majority. One obvious solution exists: reject the Bible as an honest attempt to get at the truth. It must come with an honest and brave look at the flaws of its central protagonists, Yahweh and Jesus.
Jesus claimed to have performed miraculous cures, turned water into wine, raising Lazarus to life, etc., but even a mediocre magician could perform the same “miracles.” The education and world knowledge of Jesus does not remotely compare with that of an average high-school graduate of today. Although the peasant Jesus supposedly read and spoke Aramaic as well as Hebrew and possibly Greek, no writings from the alleged Jesus exist. He originated no new information, no new morality or solutions to the world. His most original aspect, perhaps, went towards expanding the horrific idea of the damnation of Hell, a dubious honor to behold. He had only rudimentary knowledge of his world and certainly no scientific sophistication. In short, nothing about Jesus appears extraordinary and the words of the Bible give no reason for any special esteem.
Belief and faith can have such a powerful hold on many Christians that it sometimes resembles an addiction to a powerful drug. In such cases, nothing can shake the addiction to their belief in Jesus, regardless of the teeth of Biblical evidence against him. But remember that just a few decades ago, a man named Hitler also held a fascination by faithful followers. Although, Hitler fought against Jews and created war, many followers dismissed these things for what they saw in him as “good.” Hitler himself said “I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.” (Mein Kampf). He held a love for the German people and brought them out of poverty, acted kindly towards pet dogs, and ate as a vegetarian. Should we ignore the atrocities from Hitler and honor him? Of course not. And neither should we do the same from a character from any book, including the Bible.
The problems of belief do not come from Bibles, Jesus, or Satan but rather from human gullibility. We have a tendency to believe that ideas and words equal great truths. But words cannot convey ultimate truths anymore than a map can serve as the territory. All words, written or spoken, represent abstractions. Beliefs play out a dangerous aspect of humanity and the responsibility for them must lie with those who believe. Megalomaniacs like Hitler could not have gotten into power without the faith of millions of people. So also, the beliefs in the Biblical Jesus can influence the trigger of the greatest destruction of all: the self-fulfilling prophesy of the end of the world. Let us hope that we gain the ability to use our reasoning ability instead of naive unexamined belief for such a flawed character in a book.
Readers should note that I do not want to take them away from God, I still and will always believe in God as creator, as the elements of life, as mother nature and I can see God everywhere around through the magnificient works. This article is just a short narration of my detailed study and research which comes basically from the Christian churches, monasteries, schools of Theology around Europe and Middle East. The research is not at all derived from non-Christian sources or Satanists. Remarkably the top guys in vatican, schools of Theology , they all know about this fraud. My research comes directly from these guys ( who are adored a best Christians by the world ) . This is not a research from internet, but on evidences and substantial truth.
Warrior
Aren’t humans amazing? They kill wildlife – birds, deer, all kinds of cats, coyotes, beavers, groundhogs, mice and foxes by the million in order to protect their domestic animals and their feed.
Then they kill domestic animals by the billion and eat them. This in turn kills people by the million, because eating all those animals leads to degenerative – and fatal – health conditions like heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, and cancer.
So then humans spend billions of dollars torturing and killing millions more animals to look for cures for these diseases.
Elsewhere, millions of other human beings are being killed by hunger and malnutrition because food they could eat is being used to fatten domestic animals.
Meanwhile, few people recognize the absurdity of humans, who kill so easily and violently, and then call for Peace on Earth.
~Revised Preface to Old MacDonald’s Factory Farm by C. David Coates~
_____________
Anyone can break this cycle of violence! Everyone has the power to choose compassion! Please visit these websites to align your core values with life affirming choices: http://veganvideo.org & http://tryveg.com
“Cowardice asks the question, ‘Is it safe?’ Expediency asks the question, ‘Is it politic?’ Vanity asks the question, ‘Is it popular?’ But, conscience asks the question, ‘Is it right?’ And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but one must take it because one’s conscience tells one that it is right.”
~ Martin Luther King Jr.
Interesting and useful information. I just wanna tell U “Thanks”. Thanks!
Im glad to see this informative article. Thanks for such helpful and useful post.
That is f*ckin’ awesome Anil Machado's Blog . Very good and interesting article. Thanks for helpful and useful information.
I enjoyed to find this article. I like your point of view. Thanks a lot. Cheers
Im glad that I found it, Very well post here.
Good for U. I think its one of the most informative post in this theme. Lookin’ forward.
I enjoyed to c that thinks. Great informative and helpful article.
Awesome informative post. Thanks for helpful article.
So helpful and so useful post. Thanks for such informative post. Good job.
Im happy U did it. Thanks for writing so informative post. Im lookin’ forward to c and read ur next post. Cheers
I found here something new and interesting. Thanks
I have many question about your post. I think u should write lot of more details. But Thanks anymore
Today I read some very interesting article. Its Ur article. Thanks
I impressed reading your article. Keep the good job but Ill be in touch. Lookin’ forward
I’m glad it was useful to me. Thanks for your work. Ill be in touch
First of all I care for the quality of your post. That was interesting to read and helpful article. And Im lookin’ forward to see your next thinks.
Important information for me. Thanks for really competent informative article. Ill be in touch with U
Really helpful information for me. Thnak U much times as think as possible. Luv U
I think this is one of the most important information for me. And im glad reading your article. Good job, cheers
Finally someone has spoken sense about this fraud & myth of Jesus Christ. This is e great article and a logical reasoning given, I doubt if anyone would hardly doubt on this. For the 1st 250years none of the Jesus Christ monuments or tombs, or birth place existed in Isreal. It was all created by the mother of Emperor Constantine when she arrived in Isreal to create evidence to the Mythical Jesus of bible. I am from Israel and I fully comphrehend by this article by the author.
Fantastic job !
We look fro more from you!!
Shalom
GOOD ARTICLE the judeo christian blind faith only leaves tales of horror for last 2000years. As a professor of Theology and History at Tel Aviv University I agree 1 million percant by this article . Bible and the Jesus Christ story is only reproduction of myth in historic form without any historic evidence.
The best article on internet about the myth of Jesus.
I agree with this topic and appriciate the hard work of author on this subject. Looking forward to discover more from your blog keep up the good work. you give new voice to the subject
Good stuff !!!!!!!!!!!!! Excellent post.
I do not agree with the article at all……i think Mr. Anil Machado trying to gain cheap publicity through such acticles. Also only the positive responses are posted?? I think these are self interpratations out of context made by the blogger…( when other interpret its bad and when you do it its Great??????????? what’s the logic……!!!!!
Dear Mr. Anand,
All kinds of comments are published on this blog and I must insure that you have read this post entirely. There are no vague terms used and I have only made use of the verses from the Bible not on my own. The verses from the Bible are not at all out of the context and just like I have gathered information from all Christian sects around the world which have been always persecuted by the Catholic Church or the new born again syndrome. The study on this subject has taken years with real evidences personally investigated with the sources. I will allow your intelligence to act more wisely to debate with me on this topic and if you are able to gather facts, evidences ( which you can never find ) I will further proceed with my argument on the subject matter. There is nothing to take me away from God, but only to enlighten the people from the frauds of Middle Eastern religions, which have always spread on force and bloodshed. I would wait for your real response on this subject but not the manner you have commented , you arent proving anything but expressing your anger die to the fact you dont have any prrof on this subject. However, the words mentioned in Bible are they not from Jesus Christ?
Thankins for reading my blog
Well, I notice you’ve been able to see that the mainstream christianity, isn’t so christian at all. Well blind faith is blind isn’t it.
-”If, then, a blind man guides a blind man, both will fall into a pit” -Rom 15:14
Further more I want to show something of scientifically nature.
Jesus is referred to from other sources than biblical, even from non Christian or Jewish sources.
Most known is Cornelius Tacitus, who was a senator under Emperor Vespasian. Later became governor of Asia.
He refers directly to Christ in his writings. Google it up and you’ll see he was no christian. And there are many more references to christ that are non biblical.
An other aspect you take up is that most christians are christian because they are afraid of the fiery hell.
But if you really would have read your Bible you should know that the Hell teaching is not Biblical nor christian. The teaching of a fiery hell is pagan. The greek word “hades” and the hebrew word “sheol” means the kingdom of death. Or just simply the grave. Both are in many bibles translated hell. But that is not the biblical message that when you die you go to hell.
The other Hebrew word is “Gehenna” is a physical location in ancient Israel, and have a figurative meaning.
Neither is the biblical message that when you die you go to heaven.
Quite the contrary the biblical message is quite in accordance with todays science.
You might be quite surprised of what the bible says about the dead.
READ Ecclesiastes 9:5-6.
Many if not all pastors would be unable to explain that bible verse.
And compare it with Ezekiel 18:4.
It’s directly opposite of what most Christian churches teach. Or sects as you called them.
Some of you biblical quotations are either taken out of context e.g. your reference to Luke 22:36. But most of the references you make, are due your study of material from non biased source. They may seem to be correct assumptions, but they are not. E.g. your reference to luke 14:26. While the word hate is used, that is not the message, that they should hate.
Quite the contradictory
Check 1 Timothy 5:8, Ephesians 5:28-33.
In the way you portray Luke 14:26 is certainly out of context.
However you’ve come upon some very interesting scriptures that will allow yourself to actually find out what the biblical message is about. If you approach these scriptures you’ve mentioned with an open non biassed mind you will eventually get the full picture.
However your confusing yourself with the claim that Jesus would be Satan. Jesus is identified with many characters in the Bible, but never with Satan. Nor does it identify Satan with God.
However, Israel was punished many times by God. And the performer of the act it self is unknown. But Israel was brought to exile by Babylon. All accordingly to Gods will. This becomes evident when reading both Isaiah, Jeremiah and Daniel.
However references to the archangel Michael, e.g. Daniel 10:13, Jude 9, Revelation 12:7 are quite interesting, when the archangel is identified with Jesus in 1 Thessalonians 4:16.
That angel did fight for Israel. But as you already know, Jesus came with a message of war, who and what will he fight for next time. His followers where not to fight any wars. Isaiah 2:1-5, Romans 13:8-10.
Most of all the vengeance is not ours, Romans 12:17-21, Deuteronomy 32:35
Just to understand the nature of it Nahum 2:1,2 or why not the whole book of nahum.
Also Hebrew 10:26-39.
I’m sorry to see that, while you’ve proven the churches wrong in their teachings. You actually attribute that to the Bible itself. The bible message is much different to what many think it is. And it’s not just a message of Love, it is. But also a message of what that love will cause to happen.
It’s far from non-violent future we have if it goes accordingly to the Bible, still there would be an end to that violence. Which I’m sure of will happen, not once has the prophetical words in the Bible failed, I doubt the few ones still appointed for the future will fail. I’ve lived to witness some of those prophesies. Anyone born before WWI have witnessed many of them, unknowingly or knowingly.
Isaac Newton, noted a few of them in his work on the scriptures; “Observations Upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John” http://www.isaacnewton.ca/
You and I can witness it, I know I’m. And I’m choosing to take part. When it comes to Newton, he was far more knowledgeable in the scriptures than any of todays pastors, probably more knowledgable than any pastor at his own time.
There is an other prophecy which cannot be denied, which has been fulfilled Acts 15:14-20.
Are you able to discern the meaning of that scripture, it has only happened once and it’s still valid.
I appreciate you taking time to comment and respect your views on Christianity. I have investigated on the non-Christian / Jewish resources about Jesus, but it does not refer atall to the Canonical Jesus of the Gospels. Lets look at the writings of Cornelius Tacitus …….the Tacitean passage next states that these fire-setting agitators were followers of “Christus” (Christos), who, in the reign of Tiberius, “was put to death as a criminal by the procurator Pontius Pilate.” The passage also recounts that the Christians, who constituted a “vast multitude at Rome,” were then sought after and executed in ghastly manners, including by crucifixion. However, the date that a “vast multitude” of Christians was discovered and executed would be around 64 CE, and it is evident that there was no “vast multitude” of Christians at Rome by this time, as there were not even a multitude of them in Judea. Oddly, this brief mention of Christians is all there is in the voluminous works of Tacitus regarding this extraordinary movement, which allegedly possessed such power as to be able to burn Rome. Also, the Neronian persecution of Christians is unrecorded by any other historian of the day and supposedly took place at the very time when Paul was purportedly freely preaching at Rome (Acts 28:30-31), facts that cast strong doubt on whether or not it actually happened. Drews concludes that the Neronian persecution is likely “nothing but the product of a Christian’s imagination in the fifth century.” Eusebius, in discussing this persecution, does not avail himself of the Tacitean passage, which he surely would have done had it existed at the time. Eusebius’s discussion is very short, indicating he was lacking source material; the passage in Tacitus would have provided him a very valuable resource.
The problems with the authenticity of the Tacitus passage: For one, Tacitus was an imperial writer, and no imperial document would ever refer to Jesus as “Christ.” Also, Pilate was not a “procurator” but a prefect, which Tacitus would have known. Based on these and other facts, several scholars have argued that, even if the Annals themselves were genuine, the passage regarding Jesus was spurious. One of these authorities was Rev. Taylor, who suspected the passage to be a forgery because it too is not quoted by any of the Christian fathers, including Tertullian, who read and quoted Tacitus extensively. Nor did Clement of Alexandria notice this passage in any of Tacitus’s works, even though one of this Church father’s main missions was to scour the works of Pagan writers in order to find validity for Christianity. As noted, the Church historian Eusebius, who likely forged the Testimonium Flavianum, does not relate this Tacitus passage in his abundant writings. Indeed, no mention is made of this passage in any known text prior to the 15th century.
The tone and style of the passage are unlike the writing of Tacitus, and the text “bears a character of exaggeration, and trenches on the laws of rational probability, which the writings of Tacitus are rarely found to do.” Taylor further remarks upon the absence in any of Tacitus’s other writings of “the least allusion to Christ or Christians.” In his well-known Histories, for example, Tacitus never refers to Christ, Christianity or Christians. Furthermore, even the Annals themselves have come under suspicion, as they themselves had never been mentioned by any ancient author….
In any event, even if the Annals were genuine, the pertinent passage itself could easily be an interpolation, based on the abundant precedents and on the fact that the only manuscript was in the possession of one person, de Spire. In reality, “none of the works of Tacitus have come down to us without interpolations.”
Regarding Christian desperation for evidence of the existence of Christ, Dupuis comments that true believers are “reduced to look, nearly a hundred years after, for a passage in Tacitus” that does not even provide information other than “the etymology of the word Christian,” or they are compelled “to interpolate, by pious fraud, a passage in Josephus.” Neither passage, Dupuis concludes, is sufficient to establish the existence of such a remarkable legislator and philosopher, much less a “notorious impostor.”
It is evident that Tacitus’s remark is nothing more than what is said in the Apostle’s Creed—to have the authenticity of the mighty Christian religion rest upon this Pagan author’s scanty and likely forged comment is preposterous. Even if the passage in Tacitus were genuine, it would be too late and is not from an eyewitness, such that it is valueless in establishing an “historical” Jesus, representing merely a recital of decades-old Christian tradition.
The confusing characters of gospel Jesus where at one point he is prince of peace and yet in another he comes with sword. These statements Biblically are contradictory and as mentioned in Luke 22:36, Luke 14: 26, 1 Timothy 5:8, Eph 5:28 -33 are not atall out of context , as I dont intend to put here the entire verses for the reader to understand. These statements would seem confusing, yes even to me, if I was not a scholar in Egyptology. I observe these statements in the Pistis Sophia where the Egypto-Gnostic Jesus or in Egyptain Book of Dead Horus has these dual characters. Which the Gospel writers have not been able to seperate. The statements in above verses are nothing but copy and paste from the Osirian cult, which was thousands of years pre-extant to Judeo-Christianity. The dual character of Horus which in his first advent is of prince of peace and in the second advent he comes with the sword to gloryfy his father and avenge the rebel forces ( in the earth of eternity – Amenta ). The first phase or advent of Horus is finished at 12 and then the next is at 30 , offcourse I will not go into the details of Horus here as its just the same story which has been reproduced in our current Gospel. However, the Egytians didnt not take this Osiris / Horus story as historical fact, but limited it to only mythos and astro-theology. The creation, Exodus, mount transfiguration, baptism, blood, water, virgin birth, saviour, trinity, son of god, second coming, revelation has all been pre-extant to Judeo-Christianity and merely forged renderings to give historical essence in the canonical gospels.
Gehenna should be carefully distinguished from ‘Hades’ which is never used for the place of punishment, but for the place of departed spirits without reference to their mortal condition. This word is often used in N.T. and confused with its original Greek meaning ( Not Hebrew ) of Ge-Hinnom. ‘Hell’ or ‘Sheol’ or ‘Hades’ is only deriving from mythology, which in the Bible its made to look real. These words are exploited to the maximum by Roman Catholic church last 1800years. Upon examination of the Hebrew scriptures the only primary meaning is, the place or state of dead.
It does not refer to the future place of eternal torment.
Even the todays version of Christianity has been fashioned to us by a pagan Constantine, indeed history tells how the other Christian/ gnostic / essences sects were destroyed by the early founders of Christianity and hundred throusands of original writings destroyed. Few do survive at vatican and one say when it will be exposed to people vatican will no longer exist. Bible does provide some good points like the many other religions around the world so, but that doesnt mean that we take mythology for historical fact. Christianity was founded to resurrect the dying Roman empire and so it has prevailed till today in the form of Christianity. If we speak about love & peace in Bible then I guess Buddhism will result victorious as compared to Christianity. But we are not here to discuss which religion is at its best, but just to expose the false dogmas & mythos.
If we just need to learn how to live and be good then there are thousands of authors who have written great philosopy and way of living with love and peace , so does that make the Jesus of bible look small in comparison, No thats not the idea. We cannot take Bible as literal history and Jesus the redeemer or prince of peace or waging war in future or son of God, its all myths …made to look real.
Finally I do not say that God doesnt exist, I totally believe in the creator as the supreme cosmic force which fills all space and void and gives life. No one has ever known the name of the creator and we are only confusing with all these religious dogmas of the major religions. Every religion will try to make its theology real and true path and eventually spread bloodshed.
“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” – 1 Corinthians 2:14 -
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” – Ephesians 6:12 -
With respect to the reality and activity of Satan and other infernal entities, I invite the blogger to ruminate on the following quotation gems from none other than Dr. Jacques Vallee, arguably the world’s leading scientific authority on the UFO/Alien Abduction Phenomenon:
“It appears that we are sharing this planet with another race…This race is invisible to us, is more intelligent than we are, and is hostile to us. It is trying to control our destiny by influencing our imaginations.” (Note: this is a summary, not a verbatim quote.) – Dr. Jacques Vallee, Passport to Magonia -
“I would like to step outside the conditioning maze and see what makes it tick. I wonder what I would find. Perhaps a terrible, superhuman monstrosity, the very contemplation of which would make a man insane?” – Dr. Jacques Vallee, The Invisible College -
“Human beings are under the control of a strange force that bends them in absurd ways, forcing them to play a role in a bizarre game of deception.”
- Dr. Jacques Vallee, Messengers of Deception -
If this view were merely the position of Christians who have investigated the UFO Phenomenon, it might well be dismissed as so much narrow-minded religious paranoia. But when we find that this conclusion is supported directly, and indirectly, by secular experts who have no interest in supporting Christianity generally, then we know that we have discovered the truth as taught in the very Bible you malign:
(1) That there is an invisible race of Inter-dimensional Beings (IDBs) on levels of existence coinciding with our own.
(2) That they have been actively involved with humanity down the centuries.
(3) That this race is unflaggingly hostile to humankind.
(4) One of its primary goals is to promote a New One-World Religion which is integral to the plan for domination of humanity as an exploitable psychical and biological resource.
(5) These IDBs will eventually succeed in convincing almost everyone that there is no need of a personal Saviour.
Our research is done on actual places, schools of theology, churchs, other christian cults, sects, universities, Catholic monasteries, seminaries etc. around Israel, North Africa, Middle East, Europe & Asia. These are all on real investigations and not done through google search, otherwise there is no need for us to post these articles.
Concerning Jesus either being the devil or being from the devil, I too have struggled with this. But after much prayer and meditation I began to see a stark difference. If you read the works of Christ you will see that He truly did nothing for himself, as in acts of selfishness. Take, for example, when the devil asked Jesus to turn a stone into bread. I sat and wondered what would have been so bad about that act. Jesus wasnt harming anyone or destroying anything that belonged to someone else. So what was so wrong with it? The answer that God gave me was a very simple one. If Christ Jesus would have turned the stone into bread He would have been using His powers in a selfish way; turning the rock into bread because He, himself, was hungry and wanted something to eat. This is opposite to where Christ fed the 5,000 and 4,000 where Christ worked a miracle with both fish and bread to feed other people. Yes, He did partake of it, but the reason behind it was to feed the masses not himself. If you pay close attention to all that Jesus did, you will see that He never, not once, did something in selfishness.
Christ also addressed the issue of other peoples claims that He was using the “power of Beelzebub to drive out devils.” I believe that his argument that Christ gave in His defense still stands with sound and solid reasoning.
“And He was casting out a demon, and it was mute. So it was, when the demon had gone out, that the mute spoke; and the multitudes marveled. But some of them said, “He casts out demons by Beelzebub, the ruler of the demons.” Others, testing Him, sought from Him a sign from heaven. But He, knowing their thoughts, said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and a house divided against a house falls. “If Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? Because you say I cast out demons by Beelzebub. “And if I cast out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges. “But if I cast out demons with the finger of God, surely the kingdom of God has come upon you. “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are in peace. “But when a stronger than he comes upon him and overcomes him, he takes from him all his armor in which he trusted, and divides his spoils.” (Luke 11:14-22)
The response of Christ to those that were accusing Him of being the “prince of demons” and using the power of “Beelzebub” to cast out demos was is thus in a nut shell: “If I were the prince of demons or using the power of Beelzebub then I would not be casting out demons and healing the sick.” Meaning, if Christ were of the devil, or the devil himself, then you would not see him doing selfless acts of trying to help people. Christ would not be seen casting out demons or healing the sick. Instead you would see him putting demons into people and you would see him spreading sickness and disease. He wouldnt give anything away, He would keep it all for Himself. He wouldn’t help anyone, He would care only for himself. Christ wouldnt teach love and forgiveness if he were of the devil.. He would never say something like, “To him who strikes you on the one cheek, offer the other also. And from him who takes away your cloak, do not withhold your tunic either.” (Luke 6:29) You would see Jesus teaching people to hurt those that stole, destroy those that hurt you. But this, again, is not what you see him saying. Instead you see this,
“But if you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who do good to you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners do the same. And if you lend to those from whom you hope to receive back, what credit is that to you? For even sinners lend to sinners to receive as much back. But love your enemies, do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High. For He is kind to the unthankful and evil. Therefore be merciful, just as your Father also is merciful.“ (Luke 6:32-36)
And again in Matthew,
“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. If anyone wants to sue you and take away your tunic, let him have your cloak also. And whoever compels you to go one mile, go with him two. Give to him who asks you, and from him who wants to borrow from you do not turn away. You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet your brethren only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so? Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect. “ (Matthew 5:38-48)
My point is thus: If you pay close attention to Christ, His teaching and He works, you will see that He practiced what He preached. He totally gave of Himself, even to the point of His own life. He did nothing out of selfishness, and only sought to help and rebuild people. This is completely contrary to what you would expect to see if He was someone that was evil.
To further the point He also made a distinction:
“Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and a house divided against a house falls. “If Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? Because you say I cast out demons by Beelzebub. “And if I cast out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges. “But if I cast out demons with the finger of God, surely the kingdom of God has come upon you.”
Jesus starts off with, “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and a house divided against a house falls.” making a distinction between the work of God and the work of the devil. And Jesus makes a very good point following that, “If Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand?” Casting out demons and healing the sick goes against the work of the devil, if He, that is Christ, came from the devil or is the devil himself then what He(Jesus) is doing by casting out demons and healing sickness is working against the devils purpose and goals. Christ then reinforces this distinction further.
“But if I cast out demons with the finger of God, surely the kingdom of God has come upon you. “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are in peace. “But when a stronger than he comes upon him and overcomes him, he takes from him all his armor in which he trusted, and divides his spoils.”
Strong man = the devil.
Palace = Earth.
Goods = people.
Stronger Man = Jesus.
What Christ is saying is that He is of God and that God is greater then the demons or the devil and they(the devil and the demons) are therefor subjected to His (Christ and YHWH) Authority. Jesus and His Father are at the very top of the hierarchy, the demons and devils are below them. Thus when Christ says You must leave, the devil must leave. It does not work the other way around, the devil has no authority over Christ or The Heavenly Father.
Concerning the part about Christ bringing a sword, division, fire, etc.
“Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’ He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it.” (Matthew 10:34-39)
And again in Luke
“I came to send fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! But I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how distressed I am till it is accomplished! Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you, not at all, but rather division. For from now on five in one house will be divided: three against two, and two against three. Father will be divided against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.” – ([Luke 12:49-53)
These passages can be difficult to understand. Christ never said that immediately following His death and resurrection there would be peace on earth, nor did He ever make any claims about having a peaceful life for believing and trusting in Him. Instead, He says the opposite. “… for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. “ (Matthew 5:45) Meaning that both good and bad go through both good times and bad times. And again,
“And whoever does not bear his cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple. For which of you, intending to build a tower, does not sit down first and count the cost, whether he has enough to finish it― lest, after he has laid the foundation, and is not able to finish, all who see it begin to mock him, saying, ‘This man began to build and was not able to finish.’ Or what king, going to make war against another king, does not sit down first and consider whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? Or else, while the other is still a great way off, he sends a delegation and asks conditions of peace. So likewise, whoever of you does not forsake all that he has cannot be My disciple. “ (Luke 14:27-33)
Again, this more scripture that can be difficult to understand. What Christ is talking about here is all the sacrifices you will have to make in order to be His disciple. Which is everything about you. All your dreams, desires, wants, needs, etc, are to be replaced with Gods. Christ is referring to those whom begin to follow Him, realize how difficult it will be, what they have to give up, etc and abandon following Him. And the with the sacrifices it is implied that there will be strugles… Deep down in your heart i know you know this
“If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My word, they will keep yours also. But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know Him who sent Me.” (John 15:18-21)
This is the division that Christ spoke of. When you become a part of Christ you are different, and you do change.. you are not this person any more Anil.. and that person really is no longer a part of the fallen sinful world. Granted, it might be a small change at first, but after a while of walking with God you find that, after looking, the change has gone from small to great. The world also hates your living guts when you begin to follow Jesus. But again, who am i to preach to you.. when you have so beautifully done so in the past..
True world peace will not come until after Christ returns and everything gets remade new. The best way I can describe this is through an illustration. Think of sin and death as a cancerous growth. Prior to the fall of man everything was perfect. After sin and death entered into the world everything that was created grew this cancerous growth. The growth was poisonous and adversely effected everything(as in appearence, performance, emotion every aspect of being). Instead of God destroying the entire creation and starting over from scratch, Like He displayed that He could in Noah’s flood, He took a different route. He overcame this cancerous growth by allowing His Son, Christ Jesus, to be the sacrifice for this growth. The growth and its physical effects are still there, for example the Creation is still in a fallen state. But God provided a way out of that fallen state in a spiritual form through His Son Jesus. The thing is, the change and way out is not an instantaneous transformation. The cancerous grown still effects our flesh, but it no longer effects what matters most, our soul. We willstill die a physical death, but our soul will be given a new body at the appointed time by the Heavenly Father Himself. Everything in creation will still pass away because of that cancerous growth, but it will be remade new again but without that cancerous growth.
It can be difficult to fully understand what Christ says at times. I know because I struggle with it myself. Often times, when the meaning seems complex, the answer usually ends up being very simple. Christ did say some strange things and some very strange things about family, there is no doubt about that. Though what He was wanting from people was to put God and His work first and foremost in their lives, instead of family(which is usually an extremely close tie for people) or anything else. God would become the caretaker for both you and your… family. If you were to sacrifice everything that you are to God, you would find Him standing right there meeting all your needs and fulfilling and changing your dreams, your desires and yourself.Please think and PLEASE pray.. this hurts me to see more than you can ever immagine.
Dear Erika,
Thanks for your valuable comment. Appreciate it.
Regards
Anil
Dear Erika,
The story of Jesus Christ is nothing, but a myth. The same story pre-dated the Judeo-Christian era by thousands of years. Today the scriptures, we call as inspired Gods word is nothing but a book complied after loosely collecting, fabricating, the allegorical other ancient works. The concoctions and interpolations given in the bible are totally messy. I can explain the dual character of Jesus where in one verse he is prince of peace and yet in another he comes with sword. We find it confusing because these are two different strories from Egypt of Child Horus as the peacful one , the word, the son of God the father ( Osiris ) and in his second character he is a grown up man full in spirit at 30-33 years, in this phase Horus comes to avenge the death of his father with sword. Thats the reason teh gospel writers are unable to fill up the missing years of Jesus and also unable to explain the dual character of Jesus. The two characters of child Horus & grown Horus have been merged in the allegorical narration of Jesus.
Even Gnostic Paul was unable to comprehend with his opponents Peter, James & John on the theology of Christ. Pauls Christ is totally of the spirit and nothing to do with a historical Christ that never ever existed. Otherwise the two so called canonical saints would not have indulged in animosity with eachother. The Gnostics understood the spiritual concept of Christ within very well, but to their dismay the Jewish ( Peter, James & John ) were humanising the spiritual Christ. Thats the reason Paul said to Peter that his Christ was different then Pauls and Peter equally accused Paul of following some other Christ. If there was real Nazerath or Jesus Christ at that time, then for sure Paul would have made atleast some efforts to know about the historical ( human ) Christ, but no its not the case.
The Bible is full of allegorical work and fraud drama copied from the ancient Egyptain/ Druid mythology. Indeed we see mythos made real in Bible.
I do not say there is no God , I do firmly believe in God or Gods….I know he /she is there everywhere.
However, my task here is to debunk the foolish fables of judeo-Christianity which has been making the human mind lame due to these stupid mythologies. The Jesus story is good to read like Harry Potter or Lord of the rings, but come one dont ask me to get inspired or to consider it as Gods word. The bible gives us a very complicated narration of God ….
Thanks
Anil
Spot on with this write-up, I really think this website wants rather more consideration. Ill in all probability be again to learn rather more, thanks for that info.